What Is Allocational Efficiency?

Allocational efficiency, also known as allocative efficiency, is a characteristic of an efficient market where capital is assigned in a way that is most beneficial to the parties involved.

Allocational efficiency represents an optimal distribution of goods and services to consumers in an economy and an optimal distribution of financial capital to firms or projects among investors. Under allocational efficiency, all goods, services, and capital are allotted and distributed to their very best use under allocational efficiency.

Understanding Allocational Efficiency

Allocational efficiency occurs when organizations in public and private sectors spend their resources on projects that will be the most profitable and do the most good for the population, thereby promoting economic growth. This is made possible when parties are able to use the accurate and readily available data reflected in the market to make decisions about how to utilize their resources.

When all of the data affecting a market is accessible, companies can make accurate decisions about what projects might be most profitable, and manufacturers can concentrate on producing products most desired by the general population.

In economics, allocative efficiency materializes at the intersection of the supply and demand curves. At this equilibrium point, the price offered for a given supply exactly matches the demand for that supply at that price, and so all products are sold.

Requirements for Allocational Efficiency

In order to be allocationally efficient, a market must be efficient overall. An efficient market is one in which all pertinent data regarding the market and its activities is readily available to all market participants and is always reflected in market prices.

For the market to be efficient, it must be both informationally efficient and transactionally or operationally efficient. When a market is informationally efficient, all necessary and pertinent information about the market is readily available to all parties involved in the market. In other words, no parties have an informational advantage over any other parties.

Meanwhile, all transaction costs are reasonable and fair when a market is transactionally efficient. This ensures that all transactions are equally executable by all parties and not prohibitively expensive to anyone. If these conditions of fairness are met, and the market is efficient, capital flows will direct themselves to the places where they will be the most effective, providing an optimal risk/reward scenario for investors.

What Is the Aroon Oscillator?

The Aroon Oscillator is a trend-following indicator that uses aspects of the Aroon Indicator (Aroon Up and Aroon Down) to gauge the strength of a current trend and the likelihood that it will continue.

Understanding the Aroon Oscillator

Aroon oscillator readings above zero indicate that an uptrend is present, while readings below zero indicate that a downtrend is present. Traders watch for zero line crossovers to signal potential trend changes. They also watch for big moves, above 50 or below -50 to signal strong price moves.

The Aroon Oscillator was developed by Tushar Chande in 1995 as part of the Aroon Indicator system. Chande’s intention for the system was to highlight short-term trend changes. The name Aroon is derived from the Sanskrit language and roughly translates to “dawn’s early light.”

The Aroon Indicator system includes Aroon Up, Aroon Down, and Aroon Oscillator. The Aroon Up and Aroon Down lines must be calculated first before drawing the Aroon Oscillator. This indicator typically uses a timeframe of 25 periods, however, the timeframe is subjective. Using more periods garners fewer waves and a smoother-looking indicator. Using fewer periods generates more waves and a quicker turnaround in the indicator. The oscillator moves between -100 and 100. A high oscillator value is an indication of an uptrend while a low oscillator value is an indication of a downtrend.

Aroon Up and Aroon Down move between zero and 100. On a scale of zero to 100, the higher the indicator’s value, the stronger the trend. For example, a price reaching new highs one day ago would have an Aroon Up value of 96 ((25-1)/25)x100). Similarly, a price reaching new lows one day ago would have an Aroon Down value of 96 ((25-1)x100).

The highs and lows used in the Aroon Up and Aroon Down calculations help to create an inverse relationship between the two indicators. When the Aroon Up value increases, the Aroon Down value will typically see a decrease and vice versa.

When Aroon Up remains high from consecutive new highs, the oscillator value will be high, following the uptrend. When a security’s price is on a downtrend with many new lows, the Aroon Down value will be higher resulting in a lower oscillator value.

The Aroon Oscillator line can be included with or without the Aroon Up and Aroon Down when viewing a chart. Significant changes in the direction of the Aroon Oscillator can help to identify a new trend.

Aroon Oscillator Formula and Calculation

The formula for the Aroon oscillator is:

$\begin{aligned} &\text{Aroon Oscillator}=\text{Aroon Up}-\text{Aroon Down}\\ &\text{Aroon Up}=100*\frac{\left(25 – \text{Periods Since 25-Period High}\right)}{25}\\ &\text{Aroon Down}=100*\frac{\left(25 – \text{Periods Since 25-Period Low}\right)}{25}\\ \end{aligned}$​Aroon Oscillator=Aroon Up−Aroon DownAroon Up=100∗25(25−Periods Since 25-Period High)​Aroon Down=100∗25(25−Periods Since 25-Period Low)​​

To calculate the Aroon oscillator:

1. Calculate Aroon Up by finding how many periods it has been since the last 25-period high. Subtract this from 25, then divide the result by 25. Multiply by 100.
2. Calculate Aroon Down by finding how many periods it has been since the last 25-period low. Subtract this from 25, then divide the result by 25. Multiply by 100.
3. Subtract Aroon Down from Aroon Up to get the Aroon Oscillator value.
4. Repeat the steps as each time period ends.

Aroon oscillator differs from the rate of change (ROC) indicator in that the former is tracking whether a 25-period high or low occurred more recently while the latter tracks the momentum by looking at highs and lows and how far the current price has moved relative to a price in the past.

Aroon Oscillator Trade Signals

The Aroon Oscillator can generate trade signals or provide insight into the current trend direction of an asset.

When the oscillator moves above the zero line, the Aroon Up is crossing above the Aroon Down and the price has made a high more recently than a low, a sign that an uptrend is beginning.

When the oscillator moves below zero, the Aroon Down is crossing below the Aroon Up. A low occurred more recently than a high, which could signal that a downtrend is starting.

Limitations of Using the Aroon Oscillator

The Aroon Oscillator keeps a trader in a trade when a long-term trend develops. During an uptrend, for example, the price tends to keep achieving new highs which keep the oscillator above zero.

During choppy market conditions, the indicator will provide poor trade signals, as the price and the oscillator whipsaw back and forth.

The indicator may provide trade signals too late to be useful. The price may have already run a significant course before a trade signal develops. The price may be due for a retracement when the trade signal is appearing.

The number of periods is also arbitrary and there is no validity that a more recent high or low within the last 25-periods will guarantee a new and sustained uptrend or downtrend.

The indicator is best used in conjunction with price action analysis fundamentals of long-term trading, and other technical indicators.

Investopedia does not provide tax, investment, or financial services and advice. The information is presented without consideration of the investment objectives, risk tolerance, or financial circumstances of any specific investor and might not be suitable for all investors. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.

What Is Average Selling Price (ASP)?

The term average selling price (ASP) refers to the price at which a certain class of good or service is typically sold. The average selling price is affected by the type of product and the product life cycle. The ASP is the average selling price of the product across multiple distribution channels, across a product category within a company, or even across the market as a whole.

Understanding Average Selling Price (ASP)

The average selling price is the price for a product or service in various markets, and is normally used in the retail and technology industries. The established ASP for a particular good can act as a benchmark price, helping other manufacturers, producers, or retailers set the prices for their own products.

Marketers who try to set a price for a product must also consider where they want their product to be positioned. If they want their product image to be part of a high-quality choice, they have to set a higher ASP.

Products like computers, cameras, televisions, and jewelry tend to have higher average selling prices while products like books and DVDs will have a low average selling price. When a product is the latter part of its product life cycle, the market is most likely saturated with competitors, therefore, driving down the ASP.

In order to calculate the ASP, divide the total revenue earned from the product by the total number of units sold. This average selling price is usually reported during quarterly financial results and can be considered as accurate as possible given regulation on fraudulent reporting.

Special Considerations

The smartphone market is a big industry which uses average selling prices. In the smartphone market, the average selling price indicates how much money a handset manufacturer is receiving on average for the phones that it sells.

For product-driven companies like Apple, calculations for average selling price provide pivotal information about its financial performance and, by extension, the performance of its stock price. In fact, there’s a clear relationship between Apple’s iPhone ASP and its stock price movements.

The iPhone’s ASP matters even more when considering how each device drives overall profitability for Apple. Apple consolidates its operations under a single profit-and-loss statement (P&L), meaning investors can’t tell how costs, such as marketing and research and development (R&D) are spread among the company’s various products.

Since the iPhone has the highest gross margin in Apple’s device family, the device generates the lion’s share of Apple’s profits. That makes the iPhone crucial in determining Apple’s overall financial performance each quarter.

Examples of Average Selling Price

The term average selling price has a place in the housing market. When the average selling price of a home within a particular region rises, this may be a signal of a booming market. Conversely, when the average price drops, so does the perception of the market in that particular area.

Some industries use ASP in a slightly different way. The hospitality industry—especially hotels and other lodging companies—commonly refers to it as the average room or average daily rate. These average rates tend to be higher during peak seasons, while rates normally drop when travel seems to be low or during off-seasons.

What Was a 412(i) Plan?

A 412(i) plan was a defined-benefit pension plan that was designed for small business owners in the U.S. It was classified as a tax-qualified pension plan, so any amount that the owner contributed to it could immediately be taken as a tax deduction by the company. Guaranteed annuities or a combination of annuities and life insurance were the only things that could fund a 412(i) plan. The 412(i) plan was replaced by the 412(e)(3) plan after Dec. 31, 2007.

Understanding a 412(i) Plan

Notably, 412(i) plans were developed for small business owners who often found it difficult to invest in their company while trying to save for employees’ retirement. The 412(i) plan was unique in that it provided fully guaranteed retirement benefits.

An insurance company had to sponsor the 412(i) plan, and only insurance products like annuities and life insurance policies could fund it. Contributions to it provide the largest tax deduction possible.

An annuity is a financial product that an individual can purchase via a lump-sum payment or installments. The insurance company, in turn, pays the owner a fixed stream of payments at some point in the future. Annuities are primarily used as an income stream for retirees. 

Due to the large premiums that had to be paid into the plan each year, a 412(i) plan was not ideal for all small business owners. The plan tended to benefit small businesses that were more established and profitable.

For example, a startup that had gone through several rounds of funding would have been in a better position to create a 412(i) plan than one that was bootstrapped and/or had angel or seed funding.

These companies also often don’t generate enough free cash flow (FCF) to put away consistently for employees’ retirement. Instead, the founding team members often re-invest any profits or outside funding back into their product or service to generate new sales and make updates to their core offerings.

412(i) Plans and Compliance Issues

In August 2017, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) identified 412(i) plans as being involved in various types of non-compliance. These also included abusive tax avoidance transaction issues. To help organizations with 412(i) plans come into compliance, the IRS developed the following survey. They asked:

• Do you have a 412(i) plan?
• If so, how do you fund this plan? (i.e., annuities, insurance contracts, or a combination?)
• What is the amount of the death benefit relative to the amount of retirement benefit for each plan participant?
• Have you had a listed transaction under Revenue Ruling 2004-20? If so, have you filed Form 8886, Reportable Transaction Disclosure Statement?
• Finally, who sold the annuities and/or insurance contracts to the sponsor?

A survey of 329 plans yielded the following:

• 185 plans referred for examination
• 139 plans deemed to be “compliance sufficient”
• Three plans under “current examination”
• One plan noted as “compliance verified” (meaning no further contact was necessary)
• One plan labeled as not a 412(i) plan

412(e)(3)

Due to the abuses of the 412(i) plan resulting in tax avoidance schemes, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) moved the 412(i) provisions to 412(e)(3), effective for plans beginning after Dec. 31, 2007. 412(e)(3) functions similarly to 412(i), except that it is exempt from the minimum funding rule. According to the IRS, the requirements for 412(e)(3) are as follows:

• Plans must be funded exclusively by the purchase of a combination of annuities and life insurance contracts or individual annuities,
• Plan contracts must provide for level annual premium payments to be paid extending not later than the retirement age for each individual participating in the plan, and commencing with the date the individual became a participant in the plan (or, in the case of an increase in benefits, commencing at the time such increase becomes effective),
• Benefits provided by the plan are equal to the benefits provided under each contract at normal retirement age under the plan and are guaranteed by an insurance carrier (licensed under the laws of a state to do business with the plan) to the extent premiums have been paid,
• Premiums payable under such contracts for the plan year, and all prior plan years, have been paid before lapse or there is a reinstatement of the policy,
• No rights under such contracts have been subject to a security interest at any time during the plan year, and
• No policy loans are outstanding at any time during the plan year