Posts Tagged ‘framework’

What Are Accounting Policies and How Are They Used? With Examples

Written by admin. Posted in A, Financial Terms Dictionary

What Are Accounting Policies and How Are They Used? With Examples

[ad_1]

What Are Accounting Policies?

Accounting policies are the specific procedures implemented by a company’s management team that are used to prepare its financial statements. These include any accounting methods, measurement systems, and procedures for presenting disclosures. Accounting policies differ from accounting principles in that the principles are the accounting rules, and the policies are a company’s way of adhering to those rules.

Key Takeaways

  • Accounting policies are procedures that a company uses to prepare financial statements.
  • Unlike accounting principles, which are rules, accounting policies are the standards for following those rules. 
  • Accounting policies may be used to manipulate earnings legally.
  • A company’s choice in accounting policies will indicate whether management is aggressive or conservative in reporting its earnings.
  • Accounting policies still need to adhere to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

How Accounting Policies Are Used

Accounting policies are a set of standards that govern how a company prepares its financial statements. These policies are used to deal specifically with complicated accounting practices such as depreciation methods, recognition of goodwill, preparation of research and development (R&D) costs, inventory valuation, and the consolidation of financial accounts. These policies may differ from company to company, but all accounting policies are required to conform to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and/or international financial reporting standards (IFRS).

Accounting principles can be thought of as a framework in which a company is expected to operate. However, the framework is somewhat flexible, and a company’s management team can choose specific accounting policies that are advantageous to the financial reporting of the company. Because accounting principles are lenient at times, the specific policies of a company are very important.

Looking into a company’s accounting policies can signal whether management is conservative or aggressive when reporting earnings. This should be taken into account by investors when reviewing earnings reports to assess the quality of earnings. Also, external auditors who are hired to review a company’s financial statements should review the company’s policies to ensure they conform to GAAP.

Important

Company management can select accounting policies that are advantageous to their own financial reporting, such as selecting a particular inventory valuation method.

Example of an Accounting Policy

Accounting policies can be used to legally manipulate earnings. For example, companies are allowed to value inventory using the average cost, first in first out (FIFO), or last in first out (LIFO) methods of accounting. Under the average cost method, when a company sells a product, the weighted average cost of all inventory produced or acquired in the accounting period is used to determine the cost of goods sold (COGS). Under the FIFO inventory cost method, when a company sells a product, the cost of the inventory produced or acquired first is considered to be sold. Under the LIFO method, when a product is sold, the cost of the inventory produced last is considered to be sold.

In periods of rising inventory prices, a company can use these accounting policies to increase or decrease its earnings. For example, a company in the manufacturing industry buys inventory at $10 per unit for the first half of the month and $12 per unit for the second half of the month. The company ends up purchasing a total of 10 units at $10 and 10 units at $12 and sells a total of 15 units for the entire month. 

If the company uses FIFO, its cost of goods sold is: (10 x $10) + (5 x $12) = $160. If it uses average cost, its cost of goods sold is: (15 x $11) = $165. If it uses LIFO, its cost of goods sold is: (10 x $12) + (5 x $10) = $170. It is therefore advantageous to use the FIFO method in periods of rising prices in order to minimize the cost of goods sold and increase earnings.

What Is the Difference Between Accounting Policies and Principles?

While an accounting principle is the standardized rule set forth by a governing body, an accounting policy is the method or guideline used by management to adhere to the rule and generate financial statements.

In the United States, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) are the accounting standards accepted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain accounting principles allow for management discretion, and that is where accounting policies come into play.

What Are Some Examples of Accounting Policies?

Accounting policies appear in a business when accounting principles allow leeway in how the rules are applied to a situation. Situations that involve management discretion include:

  • Valuation of inventory
  • Valuation of investments
  • Valuation of fixed assets
  • Depreciation methods
  • Costs of R&D
  • Translation of foreign currency

What Is the Difference Between Conservative and Aggressive Accounting?

Conservative accounting uses accounting policies that tend to understate revenue and/or overstate expenses. On the other hand, aggressive accounting uses policies that tend to overstate revenue and/or understate expenses.

A company using conservative accounting policies will have lower earnings in the current year, while a company using aggressive accounting policies will show better financial performance in the current year. Conservative accounting policies will tend toward better financial performance in the long run, while aggressive accounting policies tend to lead to a decline in financial performance over the long run.

The Bottom Line

Accounting policies are different from accounting principles, which are the accounting rules to which all accounting policies must conform. A company’s management team can choose specific accounting policies that are advantageous to the firm’s financial reporting. The team might use either conservative or aggressive accounting policies, which will determine how a company’s financial performance appears in a given year.

[ad_2]

Source link

Accountability: Definition, Types, Benefits, and Example

Written by admin. Posted in A, Financial Terms Dictionary

Accountability: Definition, Types, Benefits, and Example

[ad_1]

What Is Accountability?

Accountability is an acceptance of responsibility for honest and ethical conduct towards others. In the corporate world, a company’s accountability extends to its shareholders, employees, and the wider community in which it operates. In a wider sense, accountability implies a willingness to be judged on performance.

Key Takeaways

  • Accountability is the acceptance of responsibility for one’s own actions. It implies a willingness to be transparent, allowing others to observe and evaluate one’s performance.
  • In the U.S. financial world, accountability includes a requirement that public corporations make accurate financial records available to all stakeholders.
  • Regardless of one’s profession, there are various ways to be accountable in the workplace including setting deadlines, delegating tasks, defining ownership, and rewarding success.
  • Accountability may help invoke confidence from external investors, loyalty from employees, and better company returns.
  • In recent years, there has been an increased focus on other elements of corporate accountability such as ethical conduct, environmental impact, a commitment to diversity, and fair treatment of employees.

Understanding Accountability

Accountability has become an essential concept in corporate finance. It is particularly relevant to the accounting practices that a company adopts when it prepares the financial reports that are submitted to shareholders and the government. Without checks, balances, and consequences for wrongdoing, a company cannot retain the confidence of its customers, regulators, or the markets.

However, in recent years corporate accountability has come to encompass the company’s activities as they affect the community. A company’s environmental impact, its investment decisions, and its treatment of its own employees all have come under public scrutiny.

Each industry has its own standards and rules for accountability that may evolve over time. For example, the rules for social media accountability are being written now.

Types of Accountability

The concept of accountability runs throughout all industries, sectors, companies, and professions. Here is an overview of where accountability is most prevalent in the business sector.

Corporate Accountability

At its most prosaic, accountability is about the numbers. Every public company is required to publish a financial report quarterly and annually detailing its income and expenses. An independent auditor reviewing a company’s financial statements is responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from any material misstatements caused by error or fraud. This auditor is holding the company accountable for its reporting.

Accountability requires corporate accountants to be careful and knowledgeable, as they can be held legally liable for negligence. An accountant is responsible for the integrity and accuracy of the company’s financial statements, even if an error or misstatement was made by others in the organization. This is why independent outside accountants audit the financial statements. Public companies are required to have an audit committee within the board of directors. Their job is to oversee the audit.

Political Accountability

Political accountability can relate to political contributions and how candidates use resources. For example, the non-partisan Center for Political Accountability and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania jointly publish an annual index rating the disclosure and oversight policies of major public corporations regarding their donations to political causes and candidates.

These scandals resulted in tougher regulations, and there are armies of regulators and private watchdogs working to make sure that companies report their earnings correctly, that the exchanges execute trades in a timely fashion, and that information provided to investors is timely and accurate.

The Center shines a spotlight on corporate spending to influence politicians. Recently, the Center reported in-depth on a campaign by the pharmaceutical industry to head off a proposal to allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices with vendors. The report named the names of members of Congress who accepted political donations from drugmakers.

Accountability is results-oriented. For example, after reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 44%, HP got top marks for environmental accountability.

Government Accountability

The role of corporate cash is only one of the global issues regarding government accountability.

USAID, the federal agency that administers civilian foreign aid, defines measures government accountability by these key factors: a free and fair political justice system; protection of human rights; a vibrant civil society; public confidence in the police and courts, and security sector reform.

To aid in protecting citizens, the Government Accountability program protects federal, state, and local whistleblowers who spot problems and report them to appropriate agencies. In this model, governments are held accountable through unofficial, internal audit. Anyone can report anyone else for improper behavior, forcing accountability to be systematic and prevalent throughout organizations.

Media Accountability

The media in the U.S. is uniquely protected by the First Amendment from interference by Congress. This does not mean that it is free from accountability.

The media have long been under the constant scrutiny of a number of watchdogs, internal and external. In the internet era, these have been augmented by independent fact-checking organizations such as FactCheck.org, Snopes, and PolitiFact. These and other organizations monitor the media for bias and errors and publish their findings for all to see.

Now, through the introduction of social media, individuals can now easily contribute to media. There is arguement whether the platforms (i.e. Facebook) it is a publisher or if the users of the platform are the publishers. In either case, social media continues to be under fire for spreading dangerous misinformation, providing a platform for hate speech, and having a generally lacking sense of accountability.

Accountability in the Workplace

For companies to be successful, employees must conduct themselves with accountability. This is done is several ways.

First, there are soft skill aspects of accountability. Accountability includes showing up to work when expected and showing up to work prepared for the tasks for the day. Accountability extends to every department and every employee, as it starts with being present, honest, and engaged in every day tasks outside of one’s job.

There is also a deep rooted sense of accountability in specific positions. Professionals who handle physical or digital money have a standard of accountability to be honest and responsible with funds that do not belong to them personally. Managers have a duty of accountability to properly oversee employees, treat them well, and guide them through growth opportunities.

There’s a few ways a company builds, manages, and sustains accountable practices, such as:

  • Making employees verbally commit to completing certain tasks and ensuring them follow through with these tasks.
  • Having upper management set expectations on the duties to be completed and the associated deadlines.
  • Creating a safe environment where taking risks is rewarded and learning occurs in a natural, non-threatening way.
  • Defining ownership of tasks, projects, or other aspects of work. Should there be a problem, the owner of that task or project must be held accountable.

Benefits of Accountability

Accountability will be different at every company. However, there are overarching benefits that accountability can provide should a business be able to appropriately execute accountability practices:

  • Accountability promotes operational excellence. When employees understand that their work is being looked at and will be evaluated, they are more likely to put forth stronger effort as it is understood that what they do matters. This is especially true when employees are rewarded for strong accountability with raises, promotions, and public recognition.
  • Accountability safeguards company resources. Accountability is not limited to just doing your job; it is the practice of being honest and responsible for your actions in all situations. When employees are accountable, they are held to a standard that company resources are to be respected, and employees are less like to mistreat company assets as they understand there will be consequences for their actions.
  • Accountability yields more accurate results. Companies with a standard of accountability will have boundaries of acceptable deviation. For example, a company may allow for a certain dollar threshold of financial misstatement due to immateriality. If a company holds itself accountable to a low threshold of materiality, it will not accept larger errors, unexplainable variances, or delays in reporting.
  • Accountability builds external investor trust. An investor’s confidence in a company is only driven so far based off of the prospect of financial success. Investors must believe that a company is well-run, honest, competent, and efficient with its resources. If a company can demonstrate their accountability, they will be seen more favorable, especially compared against an untrustworthy adversary.

A 2020 research study by Pew Research found that 58% found that “cancel culture” was a movement to hold people accountable for their actions, while 38% saw the movement as punishment for people who didn’t deserve it.

Accountability in the Real World

Corporate accountability can be hard to quantify but that doesn’t stop anyone from trying.

The publication Visual Capitalist ranked the best performing U.S. corporations on environmental, social, and corporate governance issues. The top performer on environmental issues was HP, which has decreased its greenhouse gas emissions by 44% since 2015. General Motors got the highest marks for social responsibility as the only U.S. company with a woman as both CEO and CFO. Qualcomm topped the list in corporate governance due to its introduction of STEM programs for women and minorities.

Some high-profile accounting scandals in the past demonstrated that a public company cannot continue to exist if it loses the trust of the financial markets and regulators.

The erstwhile energy giant Enron collapsed in 2001, taking the venerable accounting firm Arthur Andersen with it after its false accounting methods were exposed. The global financial crisis in 2008–2009 revealed gross financial speculation by some of the nation’s biggest banking institutions. The LIBOR scandal revealed currency rate manipulation by several London banks.

But many leaders have called for the creation of a new culture of accountability in finance—one that comes from within.

What Does Accountability Mean?

Accountability is the practice of being held to a certain standard of excellence. It is the idea that an individual is responsible for their actions and, if that individual chooses unfavorable actions, they will face consequences. Accountability strives to promote a high level of work, promote honesty, encourage dependability, and garner trust from members around you.

What Is an Example of Accountability?

A company can foster a sense of accountability by setting expectations with employees, delegating tasks to different members of a team, and explaining consequences if the tasks are completed incorrectly or late. Another example of accountability is a financial advisor managing a client’s funds. The advisor must not only be held to a standard of fiduciary duty, they must realize there are consequences for their actions and what they choose to do today with their client’s money will have downstream effects (either positive or negative).

How Is Accountability Defined in the Workplace?

To management coaches, accountability in the workplace goes beyond giving each employee a task to complete in a project. It also means making each individual accountable for the success or failure of their contribution to the overall project. In other words, it’s all about ownership of success—or failure.

What Does the Government Accountability Office Do?

The Government Accountability Office is the audit agency of the U.S. government.

It evaluates the effectiveness of U.S. programs and proposed programs. For example, one of its ongoing reviews examined the effectiveness of $4.8 trillion in federal spending related to the COVID-19 pandemic and made recommendations for changes to prevent misuse of funds, fraud, and errors in relief payments. Interestingly, the agency’s own reporting indicates that only 33 of a proposed 209 recommendations for improvement had been “fully adopted” as of the end of October 2021.

What Is the Difference Between Accountability and Responsibility?

A responsibility is an assigned (or self-assigned) task or project. Accountability implies a willingness to be judged on the performance of the project. Accountability does not exist in a vacuum. It requires transparency and effective communication of results with all parties that may be affected.

The Bottom Line

Accountability can be a management buzzword, or it can be a real framework for evaluating the success or failure of an individual or an entity. The concept of corporate accountability has always meant honest and transparent financial reporting. In recent years that concept has expanded to encompass a corporation’s performance and responsiveness to environmental, social, and community issues.

[ad_2]

Source link

Alternative Trading System (ATS) Definition, Regulation

Written by admin. Posted in A, Financial Terms Dictionary

Alternative Trading System (ATS) Definition, Regulation

[ad_1]

What Is an Alternative Trading System (ATS)?

An alternative trading system (ATS) is a trading venue that is more loosely regulated than an exchange. ATS platforms are often used to match large buy and sell orders among its subscribers. The most widely used type of ATS in the United States are electronic communication networks (ECNs)—computerized systems that automatically match buy and sell orders for securities in the market.

Key Takeaways

  • Alternative trading systems (ATS) are venues for matching large buy and sell transactions.
  • They are not as highly regulated as exchanges.
  • Examples of ATS include dark pools and ECNs.
  • SEC Regulation ATS establishes a regulatory framework for these trading venues.

Understanding an Alternative Trading System (ATS)

ATS account for much of the liquidity found in publicly traded issues worldwide. They are known as multilateral trading facilities in Europe, ECNs, cross networks, and call networks. Most ATS are registered as broker-dealers rather than exchanges and focus on finding counterparties for transactions.

Alternative trading system (ATS) is the terminology used in the U.S. and Canada. In Europe, they are known as multilateral trading facilities.

Unlike some national exchanges, ATS do not set rules governing the conduct of subscribers or discipline subscribers, other than by excluding them from trading. They are important in providing alternative means to access liquidity.

Institutional investors may use an ATS to find counterparties for transactions, instead of trading large blocks of shares on national stock exchanges. These actions may be designed to conceal trading from public view since ATS transactions do not appear on national exchange order books. The benefit of using an ATS to execute such orders is that it reduces the domino effect that large trades might have on the price of an equity.

Between 2013 and 2015, ATS accounted for approximately 18% of all stock trading, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). That figure represented an increase of more than four times from 2005.

Criticisms of Alternative Trading Systems (ATS)

These trading venues must be approved by the SEC. In recent years, regulators have stepped up enforcement actions against ATS for infractions such as trading against customer order flow or making use of confidential customer trading information. These violations may be more common in ATS than national exchanges because ATS face fewer regulations.

Dark Pools

A hedge fund interested in building a large position in an equity may use an ATS to prevent other investors from buying in advance. ATS used for these purposes may be referred to as dark pools.

Dark pools entail trading on ATS by institutional orders executed on private exchanges. Information about these transactions is mostly unavailable to the public, which is why they are called “dark.” The bulk of dark pool liquidity is created by block trades facilitated away from the central stock market exchanges and conducted by institutional investors (primarily investment banks).

Although they are legal, dark pools operate with little transparency. As a result, dark pools, along with high-frequency trading (HFT), are oft-criticized by those in the finance industry; some traders believe that these elements convey an unfair advantage to certain players in the stock market.

Regulation of Alternative Trading Systems (ATS)

SEC Regulation ATS established a regulatory framework for ATS. An ATS meets the definition of an exchange under federal securities laws but is not required to register as a national securities exchange if the ATS operates under the exemption provided under Exchange Act Rule 3a1-1(a). To operate under this exemption, an ATS must comply with the requirements in Rules 300-303 of Regulation ATS.

To comply with Regulation ATS, an ATS must register as a broker-dealer and file an initial operation report with the Commission on Form ATS before beginning operations. An ATS must file amendments to Form ATS to provide notice of any changes to its operations, and must file a cessation of operation report on Form ATS if it closes. The requirements for filing reports using Form ATS is in Rule 301(b)(2) of Regulation ATS. These requirements include mandated reporting of books and records.

In recent times, there have been moves to make ATS more transparent. For example, the SEC amended Regulation ATS to enhance “operational transparency” for such systems in 2018. Among other things, this entails filing detailed public disclosures to inform the general public about potential conflicts of interest and risks of information leakage. ATS are also required to have written safeguards and procedures to protect subscribers’ trading information.

The SEC formally defines an alternative trading system as “any organization, association, person, group of persons, or systems (1) that constitutes, maintains, or provides a market place or facilities for bringing together purchasers and sellers of securities or for otherwise performing with respect to securities the functions commonly performed by a stock exchange within the meaning of Rule 3b-16 under the Exchange Act; and (2) that does not (i) set rules governing the conduct of subscribers other than the conduct of such subscribers’ trading on such organization, association, person, group of persons, or system, or (ii) discipline subscribers other than by exclusion from trading.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Anti Money Laundering (AML) Definition: Its History and How It Works

Written by admin. Posted in A, Financial Terms Dictionary

Anti Money Laundering (AML) Definition: Its History and How It Works

[ad_1]

What Is Anti Money Laundering (AML)?

Anti money laundering (AML) refers to the web of laws, regulations, and procedures aimed at uncovering efforts to disguise illicit funds as legitimate income. Money laundering seeks to conceal crimes ranging from small-time tax evasion and drug trafficking to public corruption and the financing of groups designated as terrorist organizations.

AML legislation was a response to the growth of the financial industry, the lifting of international capital controls and the growing ease of conducting complex chains of financial transactions.

A high-level United Nations panel has estimated annual money laundering flows at $1.6 trillion, accounting for 2.7% of global GDP in 2020.

Key Takeaways

  • Anti Money Laundering (AML) efforts seek to make it harder to hide profits from crime.
  • Criminals use money laundering to make illicit funds appear to have a legitimate origin.
  • AML regulations require financial institutions to develop sophisticated customer due diligence plans to assess money laundering risks and detect suspicious transactions.

What’s Anti-Money Laundering?

Understanding Anti Money Laundering (AML)

AML regulations in the U.S. have expanded from the 1970 Bank Secrecy Act’s requirement that banks report cash deposits of more than $10,000 to a complex regulatory framework requiring financial institutions to conduct due diligence on customers and to seek out and report suspicious transactions. The European Union and other jurisdictions have adopted similar measures.

Know Your Customer

For banks, compliance starts with verifying the identity of new clients, a process sometimes called Know Your Customer (KYC). In addition to establishing the customer’s identity, banks are required to understand the nature of a client’s activity and verify deposited funds are from a legitimate source.

The KYC process also requires banks and brokers to screen new customers against lists of crime suspects, individuals and companies under economic sanctions, and “politically exposed persons”—foreign public officials, their family members and close associates.

Money laundering can be divided into three steps:

  • Deposit of illicit funds into the financial system
  • Transactions designed to conceal the illicit origin of the funds, known as “layering”
  • Use of laundered funds to acquire real estate, financial instruments or commercial investments

The KYC process aims to stop such schemes at the first deposit window.

Customer Due Diligence

Customer due diligence is integral to the KYC process, for example by ensuring the information a potential customer provides is accurate and legitimate. But it is also a constant process extending to customers old and new, and their transactions.

Customer due diligence requires ongoing assessment of the risk of money laundering posed by each client and the use of that risk-based approach to conduct closer due diligence for those identified as higher non-compliance risks. That includes identifying customers as they are added to sanctions and other AML lists.

According to the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the four core requirements of customer due diligence in the U.S. are:

  • Identifying and verifying the customer’s identity
  • Identifying and verifying the identity of beneficial owners with a stake of 25% or more in a company opening an account
  • Understanding the nature and purpose of customer relationships to develop customer risk profiles
  • Conducting ongoing monitoring to identify and report suspicious transactions and update customer information 

Customer due diligence seeks to detect money laundering strategies including layering and structuring, also known as “smurfing”—the breaking up of large money laundering transactions into smaller ones to evade reporting limits and avoid scrutiny.

One rule in place to foil layering is the AML holding period, which requires deposits to remain in an account for a minimum of five trading days before they can be transferred elsewhere.

Financial institutions are required to develop and implement a written AML compliance policy, which much be approved in writing by a member of senior management and overseen by a designated AML compliance officer. These programs must specify “risk-based procedures for conducting ongoing customer due diligence” and conduct “ongoing monitoring to identify and report suspicious transactions.”

Some AML requirements apply to individuals as well as financial institutions. Notably, U.S. residents are required to report receipts of more than $10,000 in cash to the Internal Revenue Service on IRS Form 8300. The requirement extends to multiple related payments within 24 hours or multiple related transactions within 12 months totaling more than $10,000.

History of Anti Money Laundering

Efforts to police illicit gains have a history stretching back centuries, while the term “money laundering” is only about 100 years old and in wide use for less than 50.

The first major piece of U.S. AML legislation was the 1970 Bank Secrecy Act, passed in part to thwart organized crime. In addition to requiring banks to report cash deposits of more than $10,000, the legislation also required banks to identify individuals conducting transactions and to maintain records of transactions. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Bank Secrecy Act’s constitutionality in 1974, the same year “money laundering” entered wide use amid the Watergate scandal.

Additional legislation passed in the 1980s amid increased efforts to fight drug trafficking, in the 1990s to expand financial monitoring and in the 2000s to cut off funding for terrorist organizations.

Anti-money laundering assumed greater global prominence in 1989, when a group of countries and international organizations formed the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Its mission is to devise international standards to prevent money laundering and promote their adoption. In October 2001, following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, FATF expanded its mandate to include combating terrorist financing.

Another important organization in the fight against money laundering is the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Like the FATF, the IMF has pressed its member countries to comply with international standards to thwart terrorist financing.

The United Nations included AML provisions in its 1998 Vienna Convention addressing drug trafficking, the 2001 Palermo Convention against international organized crime and the 2005 Merida Convention against corruption.

The Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, passed in early 2021, was the most sweeping overhaul of U.S. AML regulations since the Patriot Act of 2001. The 2021 legislation included the Corporate Transparency Act, which made it harder to use shell companies to evade anti-money laundering and economic sanctions measures.

The legislation also subjected cryptocurrency exchanges as well as arts and antiquities dealers to the same customer due diligence requirements as financial institutions.

What Are Some Ways That Money Is Laundered?

Money launderers often funnel illicit funds through associates’ cash-generating businesses, or by inflating invoices in shell company transactions. Layering transactions are money transfers designed to disguise the source of illicit funds. Structuring, or smurfing, refers to the practice of breaking up a large transfer into smaller ones to evade reporting limits and AML scrutiny.

Can Money Laundering Be Stopped?

Given estimated annual flows approaching 3% of global economic output, increasingly aggressive AML enforcement can at best aim to contain money laundering rather than stop it entirely. Money launderers never seem to run short of money or accomplices, though AML measures certainly make their lives harder.

What’s the Difference Between AML, CDD and KYC?

Anti-money laundering (AML) is the broad category of the laws, rules and procedures aimed at deterring money laundering, while customer due diligence (CDD) describes the scrutiny financial institutions (and others) are required to perform to thwart, identify and report violations. Know your client (KYC) rules apply customer due diligence to the task of screening and verifying prospective clients.

[ad_2]

Source link