Posts Tagged ‘Definition’

Accounting Profit: Definition, Calculation, Example

Written by admin. Posted in A, Financial Terms Dictionary

Accounting Profit: Definition, Calculation, Example

[ad_1]

What Is Accounting Profit?

Accounting profit is a company’s total earnings, calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). It includes the explicit costs of doing business, such as operating expenses, depreciation, interest, and taxes.

Key Takeaways

  • Accounting profit shows the amount of money left over after deducting the explicit costs of running the business.
  • Explicit costs include labor, inventory needed for production, and raw materials, together with transportation, production, and sales and marketing costs.
  • Accounting profit differs from economic profit as it only represents the monetary expenses a firm pays and the monetary revenue it receives.
  • Accounting profit also differs from underlying profit, which seeks to eliminate the impact of nonrecurring items.

How Accounting Profit Works

Profit is a widely monitored financial metric that is regularly used to evaluate the health of a company. 

Firms often publish various versions of profit in their financial statements. Some of these figures take into account all revenue and expense items, laid out in the income statement. Others are creative interpretations put together by management and their accountants.

Accounting profit, also referred to as bookkeeping profit or financial profit, is net income earned after subtracting all dollar costs from total revenue. In effect, it shows the amount of money a firm has left over after deducting the explicit costs of running the business.

The costs that need to be considered include the following:

  • Labor, such as wages
  • Inventory needed for production
  • Raw materials
  • Transportation costs
  • Sales and marketing costs
  • Production costs and overhead

Accounting Profit vs. Economic Profit

Like accounting profit, economic profit deducts explicit costs from revenue. Where they differ is that economic profit also uses implicit costs; the various opportunity costs a company incurs when allocating resources elsewhere.

Examples of implicit costs include:

  • Company-owned buildings
  • Plant and equipment
  • Self-employment resources

For example, if a person invested $100,000 to start a business and earned $120,000 in profit, their accounting profit would be $20,000. Economic profit, however, would add implicit costs, such as the opportunity cost of $50,000, which represents the salary they would have earned if they kept their day job. As such, the business owner would have an economic loss of $30,000 ($120,000 – $100,000 – $50,000).

Economic profit is more of a theoretical calculation based on alternative actions that could have been taken, while accounting profit calculates what actually occurred and the measurable results for the period. Accounting profit has many uses, including for tax declarations. Economic profit, on the other hand, is mainly just calculated to help management make a decision.

Accounting Profit vs. Underlying Profit

Companies often choose to supplement accounting profit with their own subjective take on their profit position. One such example is underlying profit. This popular, widely-used metric often excludes one-time charges or infrequent occurrences and is regularly flagged by management as a key number for investors to pay attention to.

The goal of underlying profit is to eliminate the impact that random events, such as a natural disaster, have on earnings. Losses or gains that do not regularly crop up, such as restructuring charges or the buying or selling of land or property, are usually not taken into account because they do not occur often and, as a result, are not deemed to reflect the everyday costs of running the business.

Example of Accounting Profit

Company A operates in the manufacturing industry and sells widgets for $5. In January, it sold 2,000 widgets for a total monthly revenue of $10,000. This is the first number entered into its income statement.

The cost of goods sold (COGS) is then subtracted from revenue to arrive at gross revenue. If it costs $1 to produce a widget, the company’s COGS would be $2,000, and its gross revenue would be $8,000, or ($10,000 – $2,000).

After calculating the company’s gross revenue, all operating costs are subtracted to arrive at the company’s operating profit, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). If the company’s only overhead was a monthly employee expense of $5,000, its operating profit would be $3,000, or ($8,000 – $5,000).

Once a company derives its operating profit, it then assesses all non-operating expenses, such as interest, depreciation, amortization, and taxes. In this example, the company has no debt but has depreciating assets at a straight line depreciation of $1,000 a month. It also has a corporate tax rate of 35%.

The depreciation amount is first subtracted to arrive at the company’s earnings before taxes (EBT) of $1,000, or ($2,000 – $1,000). Corporate taxes are then assessed at $350, to give the company an accounting profit of $650, calculated as ($1,000 – ($1,000 * 0.35).

[ad_2]

Source link

Average Cost Method: Definition and Formula with Example

Written by admin. Posted in A, Financial Terms Dictionary

Average Cost Method: Definition and Formula with Example

[ad_1]

What Is Average Cost Method?

Average cost method assigns a cost to inventory items based on the total cost of goods purchased or produced in a period divided by the total number of items purchased or produced. Average cost method is also known as weighted-average method.

Key Takeaways

  • Average cost method is one of three inventory valuation methods, with the other two common methods being first in, first out (FIFO) and last in, first out (LIFO).
  • Average cost method uses the weighted average of all inventory purchased in a period to assign value to the cost of goods sold (COGS) as well as the cost of goods still available for sale.
  • Once a company selects an inventory valuation method, it needs to remain consistent in its use to be compliant with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

Click Play to Learn What the Average Cost Method Is

Understanding the Average Cost Method

Businesses that sell products to customers have to deal with inventory, which is either bought from a separate manufacturer or produced by the company itself. Items previously in inventory that are sold off are recorded on a company’s income statement as cost of goods sold (COGS). COGS is an important figure for businesses, investors, and analysts as it is subtracted from sales revenue to determine gross margin on the income statement. To calculate the total cost of goods sold to consumers during a period, different companies use one of three inventory cost methods:

Average cost method uses a simple average of all similar items in inventory, regardless of purchase date, followed by a count of final inventory items at the end of an accounting period. Multiplying the average cost per item by the final inventory count gives the company a figure for the cost of goods available for sale at that point. The same average cost is also applied to the number of items sold in the previous accounting period to determine the COGS.

Example of Average Cost Method

For example, consider the following inventory ledger for Sam’s Electronics:

Purchase date Number of items Cost per unit Total cost
1/1 20 $1,000 $20,000
1/18 15 $1,020 $15,300
2/10 30 $1,050 $31,500
2/20 10 $1,200 $12,000
3/5 25 $1,380 $34,500
Total 100   $113,300

Assume the company sold 72 units in the first quarter. The weighted-average cost is the total inventory purchased in the quarter, $113,300, divided by the total inventory count from the quarter, 100, for an average of $1,133 per unit. The cost of goods sold (COGS) will be recorded as 72 units sold × $1,133 average cost = $81,576. The cost of goods available for sale, or inventory at the end of the period, will be the 28 remaining items still in inventory × $1,133 = $31,724.

Benefits of Average Cost Method

Average cost method requires minimal labor to apply and is, therefore, the least expensive of all the methods. In addition to the simplicity of applying average cost method, income cannot be as easily manipulated as other inventory-costing methods. Companies that sell products that are indistinguishable from each other or that find it difficult to find the cost associated with individual units will prefer to use average cost method. This also helps when there are large volumes of similar items moving through inventory, making it time-consuming to track each individual item.

Special Considerations

One of the core aspects of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) is consistency. The consistency principle requires a company to adopt an accounting method and follow it consistently from one accounting period to another.

For example, businesses that adopt average cost method need to continue to use this method for future accounting periods. This principle is in place for the ease of financial statement users so that figures on the financials can be compared year over year. A company that changes its inventory-costing method must highlight the change in its footnotes to the financial statements and apply the same method retroactively to prior period-comparative financial statements.

What is the average cost method formula?

The average cost method formula is calculated as:

Total Cost of Goods Purchased or Produced in Period ÷ Total Number of Items Purchased or Produced in Period = Average Cost for Period

The result can then be applied to both the cost of goods sold (COGS) and the cost of goods still held in inventory at the end of the period.

Why should I use average cost method?

Average cost method is a simple inventory valuation method, especially for businesses with large volumes of similar inventory items. Instead of tracking each individual item throughout the period, the weighted average can be applied across all similar items at the end of the period.

What inventory cost methods are acceptable under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)?

GAAP allows for last in, first out (LIFO), first in, first out (FIFO), or average cost method of inventory valuation. On the other hand, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) do not allow LIFO because it does not typically represent the actual flow of inventory through a business.

[ad_2]

Source link

Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO): Definition and Calculation

Written by admin. Posted in A, Financial Terms Dictionary

Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO): Definition and Calculation

[ad_1]

What Are Adjusted Funds From Operations—AFFO?

Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) refers to the financial performance measure primarily used in the analysis of real estate investment trusts (REITs). The AFFO of a REIT, though subject to varying methods of computation, is generally equal to the trust’s funds from operations (FFO) with adjustments made for recurring capital expenditures used to maintain the quality of the REIT’s underlying assets. The calculation takes in the adjustment to GAAP straight-lining of rent, leasing costs, and other material factors.

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) is a financial measure used to estimate the value of a real estate investment trust (REIT).
  • AFFO is based on funds from operations (FFO), but is considered preferable, because it takes costs into consideration, thus more accurately estimating the REIT’s present values and ability to pay dividends.
  • Though no one official measure exists, a AFFO formula is along the lines of AFFO = FFO + rent increases – capital expenditures – routine maintenance amounts.

Understanding Adjusted Funds From Operations—AFFO

Regardless of how industry professionals choose to compute adjusted funds from operations (AFFO), it is considered to be a more accurate measure of residual cash flow for shareholders than simple FFO. Though FFO is commonly used, it does not deduct for capital expenditures required to maintain the existing portfolio of properties, so it doesn’t quite measure the true residual cash flow. Professional analysts prefer AFFO because it takes into consideration additional costs incurred by the REIT—and additional income sources too, like rent increases. Thus, It provides for a more accurate base number when estimating present values and a better predictor of the REIT’s future ability to pay dividends. This is a non-GAAP measure.

Calculating Adjusted Funds From Operations—AFFO

Before calculating the AFFO, an analyst must first determine the REIT’s funds from operations (FFO). The FFO measures cash flow from a specified list of activities. FFO reflects the impact from the REIT’s leasing and acquisition activity, as well as interest costs. FFO takes into account the REIT’s net income including amortization and depreciation, but it excludes the capital gains from property sales. The reasons these gains are not included is that they are one time events and generally do not have a long-term effect on the REIT’s future earnings potential.

The formula for FFO is:

FFO = net income + amortization + depreciation – capital gains from property sales

Once the FFO is determined, the AFFO can be calculated. Though there is no one official formula, calculations for AFFO typically would be something like:

AFFO = FFO + rent increases – capital expenditures – routine maintenance amounts

Traditional metrics used in evaluating equities, such as earnings-per-share (EPS) and price-to-earnings ration (P/E), are not reliable in estimating the value of a REIT.

Example of an Adjusted Funds From Operations—

AFFO Calculation

As an example of the AFFO calculation, assume the following: a REIT had $2 million in net income over the last reporting period. During that time, it earned $400,000 from the sale of one of its properties and lost $100,000 from the sale of another. It reported $35,000 of amortization and $50,000 of depreciation. During the period, net rent increases were $40,000; capital expenditures were $75,000 and routine maintenance amounted to $30,000.

Given this information the FFO can be calculated as:

FFO = $2,000,000 + $35,000 + $50,000 – ($400,000 – $100,000) = $1,785,000

From this, the AFFO is calculated as:

AFFO = FFO + $40,000 – $75,000 – $30,000 = $1,720,000

[ad_2]

Source link

Annuitization Definition

Written by admin. Posted in A, Financial Terms Dictionary

Annuitization Definition

[ad_1]

What Is Annuitization?

Annuitization is the process of converting an annuity investment into a series of periodic income payments. Annuities may be annuitized for a specific period or for the life of the annuitant. Annuity payments may only be made to the annuitant or to the annuitant and a surviving spouse in a joint life arrangement. Annuitants can arrange for beneficiaries to receive a portion of the annuity balance upon their death.

Key Takeaways

  • Annuitization is the process of converting an annuity investment into a series of periodic income payments.
  • Annuities may be annuitized for a specific period or for the life of the annuitant.
  • Annuity payments may only be made to the annuitant or to the annuitant and a surviving spouse in a joint life arrangement.
  • Annuitants can arrange for beneficiaries to receive a portion of the annuity balance upon their death.

Understanding Annuitization

The concept of annuitization dates back centuries, but life insurance companies formalized it into a contract offered to the public in the 1800s.

Individuals can enter into a contract with a life insurance company that involves the exchange of a lump sum of capital for a promise to make periodic payments for a specified period or for the lifetime of the individual who is the annuitant.

How Annuitization Works

Upon receiving the lump sum of capital, the life insurer makes calculations to determine the annuity payout amount. The key factors used in the calculation are the annuitant’s current age, life expectancy, and the projected interest rate the insurer will credit to the annuity balance. The resulting payout rate establishes the amount of income that the insurer will pay whereby the insurer will have returned the entire annuity balance plus interest to the annuitant by the end of the payment period.

The payment period may be a specified period or the life expectancy of the investor. If the insurer determines that the investor’s life expectancy is 25 years, then that becomes the payment period. The significant difference between using a specified period versus a lifetime period is that, if the annuitant lives beyond their life expectancy, the life insurer must continue the payments until the annuitant’s death. This is the insurance aspect of an annuity in which the life insurer assumes the risk of extended longevity.

Annuity Payments Based on a Single Life

Annuity payments based on a single life cease when the annuitant dies, and the insurer retains the remaining annuity balance. When payments are based on joint lives, the payments continue until the death of the second annuitant. When an insurer covers joint lives, the amount of the annuity payment is reduced to cover the longevity risk of the additional life.

Annuitants may designate a beneficiary to receive the annuity balance through a refund option. Annuitants can select refund options for varying periods of time during which, if death occurs, the beneficiary will receive the proceeds. For instance, if an annuitant selects a refund option for a period certain of 10 years, death must occur within that 10-year period for the insurer to pay the refund to the beneficiary. An annuitant may select a lifetime refund option, but the length of the refund period will affect the payout rate. The longer the refund period is, the lower the payout rate.

Changes to Annuities in Retirement Accounts

In 2019, the U.S. Congress passed the SECURE Act, which made changes to retirement plans, including those containing annuities. The good news is that the new ruling makes annuities more portable. For example, if you change jobs, your 401(k) annuity from your old job can be rolled over into the 401(k) plan at your new job.

However, the SECURE Act removed some of the legal risks for retirement plans. The ruling limits the ability for account holders to sue the retirement plan if it doesn’t pay the annuity payments—as in the case of bankruptcy. Note that a safe harbor provision of the SECURE Act prevents retirement plans (and not annuity providers) from being sued.

The SECURE Act also eliminated the stretch provision for those beneficiaries who inherit an IRA. In years past, a beneficiary of an IRA could stretch out the required minimum distributions from the IRA over their lifetime, which helped to stretch out the tax burden.

With the new ruling, non-spousal beneficiaries must distribute all of the funds from the inherited IRA within 10 years of the death of the owner. However, there are exceptions to the new law. By no means is this article a comprehensive review of the SECURE Act. As a result, it’s important for investors to consult a financial professional to review the new changes to retirement accounts, annuities, and their designated beneficiaries.

[ad_2]

Source link