Brooklyn Nets vs. New York Knicks Full Game Highlights | Feb 13 | 2022-2023 NBA Season
Brooklyn Nets vs. New York Knicks Full Game Highlights | Feb 13 | 2022-2023 NBA Season
source
Brooklyn Nets vs. New York Knicks Full Game Highlights | Feb 13 | 2022-2023 NBA Season
source
[ad_1]
The term “platykurtic” refers to a statistical distribution in which the excess kurtosis value is negative. For this reason, a platykurtic distribution will have thinner tails than a normal distribution will, resulting in fewer extreme positive or negative events. The opposite of a platykurtic distribution is a leptokurtic distribution, in which excess kurtosis is positive.
Investors will consider which statistical distributions are associated with different types of investments when deciding where to invest. More risk-averse investors might prefer assets and markets with platykurtic distributions because those assets are less likely to produce extreme results.
There are three basic kinds of statistical distributions: leptokurtic, mesokurtic, and platykurtic. These distributions differ depending on their amount of excess kurtosis, which relates to the probability of extreme positive or negative events. The normal distribution, which is a type of mesokurtic distribution, has a kurtosis of three. Therefore, distributions with kurtosis greater than three are said to have “positive excess kurtosis,” while those with kurtosis of less than three are said to have “negative excess kurtosis.”
Though mesokurtic distributions have a kurtosis of three, leptokurtic and platykurtic distributions have positive and negative excess kurtosis, respectively. Therefore, leptokurtic distributions have a relatively high probability of extreme events, whereas the opposite is true for platykurtic distributions.
The following figures show charts of these three types of distributions, all with the same standard deviation. Although the figure on the left does not reveal much of the differences between these distributions’ tails, the figure on the right gives a clearer view by plotting the quantiles of the distributions against each other. This technique is known as a quantile-quantile plot, or Q-Q for short.
Most investors believe that equity market returns more closely resemble a leptokurtic distribution than a platykurtic one. That is, while most returns are likely to be similar to the average return for the market as a whole, returns will occasionally deviate widely from the mean. These dramatic and unpredictable events, sometimes referred to as black swans, are less likely to occur in markets that are platykurtic.
For this reason, more cautious investors might avoid investing in leptokurtic markets and focus on investments offering platykurtic returns. On the other hand, some investors deliberately pursue investments with leptokurtic returns, believing that their extreme positive returns will more than compensate for their extreme negative returns.
Morningstar published a research paper that featured information on the excess kurtosis levels of different types of assets, as observed between February 1994 and June 2011. The list included a wide range of investments, from U.S. and international equities to real estate, commodities, cash, and bonds.
The levels of excess kurtosis were similarly varied. On the low end of the spectrum were cash and international bonds, which had excess kurtosis of -1.43 and 0.58, respectively. On the other end of the spectrum were U.S. high-yield bonds and hedge-fund arbitrage strategies, offering excess kurtosis of 9.33 and 22.59.
Asset classes with intermediate levels of excess kurtosis included international real estate (2.61), equities from international emerging economies (1.98), and commodities (2.29).
An investor looking at this data could quickly discern what kinds of assets they wish to invest in, given their tolerance for potential black swan events. Risk-averse investors who want to minimize the likelihood of extreme events could focus on low-kurtosis investments, while investors more comfortable with extreme events could focus on high-kurtosis ones.
[ad_2]
Source link
Never miss a moment with the latest news, trending stories and highlights to bring you closer to your favorite players and teams.
Download now: https://app.link.nba.com/APP22
LeBron James recorded 26 points, 7 rebounds, and 7 assists for the Los Angeles Lakers as they defeated the Indiana Pacers, 112-111. Anthony Davis added a game-high 31 points and 14 rebounds for the Lakers in the victory, while Tyrese Haliburton tallied 26 points and 12 assists for the Pacers. The Lakers improve to 25-28 on the season, while the Pacers fall to 24-29.
LeBron James is now 63 points away from passing Kareem Abdul-Jabbar as the all-time leading scorer in NBA history
source
[ad_1]
Golfers refer to the “sweet spot” as the position on the face of the club head that when hit produces the maximum result. A very similar result occurs when investing in mid-cap stocks, those companies with market capitalizations ranging from $2 billion to $10 billion. Most often, they are established businesses sandwiched between slower growth large-cap multinationals and faster-growing small-cap businesses.
In recent years, mid-cap stocks have outperformed both their large-cap and small-cap peers with very little added risk. It’s as if they have hit the sweet spot of performance. In this article, we examine the key attributes of mid-cap stocks including how to analyze them and why you should consider these often-misunderstood stocks for your portfolio.
Having already established that the historical performance of mid-cap stocks is equal to or in many cases better than both large-cap and small-cap stocks, it’s important to point out that performance isn’t the only reason to include mid-caps in your portfolio. Several others make them very tempting indeed. For example, most mid-caps are simply small caps that have grown bigger. Additional growth makes them the stepping stones to becoming large-cap businesses. Part of growing is obtaining additional financing to fuel expansion. Mid-caps generally have an easier time of it than small caps do.
While mid-caps have an advantage over small caps when it comes to raising funds, their advantage over large caps amounts to earnings growth. Smaller in size, mid-caps often have yet to reach the mature stage where earnings slow and dividends become a bigger part of a stock’s total return. Possibly the most overlooked reason for investing in mid-caps is the fact that they receive less analyst coverage than large caps because they are less known yet and many analysts have not spotted them yet or they have not piqued the interest of the mainstream readers of analyst reports. At the same time, they have already graduated from the high-risk zone of small-cap stocks, and their business model is much more proven.
Some of the best-performing stocks historically have been unloved companies that suddenly became loved, producing the institutional buyers necessary to move their price higher. Some call this the “money flow.” Call it what you will, institutional support is vital to a rising stock price. These big players can both create and destroy value for shareholders. In the end, investing in mid-caps makes sense because they provide investors with the best of both worlds: small-cap growth combined with large-cap stability.
One of the beautiful things about mid-cap stocks is that you’re investing in businesses that are generally profitable, have been for some time and possess seasoned management teams. This doesn’t mean they’ve stopped growing; on the contrary, the average mid cap’s earnings tend to grow at a faster rate than the average small-cap while doing so with less volatility and risk. In addition to earnings growth, it’s important to find stocks whose earnings are sustainable for many years to come. That’s what turns a mid-cap into a large-cap.
Telltale signs indicating whether a company’s earnings are heading in the right direction include higher gross margins and operating margins combined with lower inventories and accounts receivable. If it routinely turns its inventory and receivables faster, this usually leads to higher cash flow and increased profits. All of these attributes help reduce risk. Mid-cap stocks tend to possess these attributes more frequently than other stocks.
Whatever size stock you’re interested in, it’s important to invest in companies with strong balance sheets. Famed investor Benjamin Graham used three criteria to assess the financial health of a company:
Given the unpredictability of business, a strong balance sheet can help companies survive the lean years. Because mid-caps tend to have stronger balance sheets than small caps, this reduces risk while providing superior returns to large caps. When investing in mid-caps, you are in a sense combining the financial strength of a large-cap with the growth potential of a small-cap with the end result often being above-average returns.
Revenue and earnings growth are the two most important factors in long-term returns. In recent years, mid-cap stocks have outperformed both large-cap and small-cap stocks because of their superior growth on both the top and bottom lines. Industry experts suggest mid-caps are able to produce better returns because they are quicker to act than large caps and more financially stable than small caps, providing a one-two punch in the quest for growth.
Investors interested in mid-cap stocks should consider the quality of revenue growth when investing. If gross and operating margins are increasing at the same time as revenues, it’s a sign the company is developing greater economies of scale resulting in higher profits for shareholders. Another sign of healthy revenue growth is lower total debt and higher free cash flow. The list goes on, and while many of the criteria investors use to assess stocks of any size definitely apply here, it’s vitally important with mid-caps that you see progress on the earnings front because that’s what’s going to turn it into a large-cap. Revenue growth is important but earnings growth is vital.
Nobody wants to overpay when shopping, and buying stocks is no different. Warren Buffett believes that “It is far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.” Many refer to people interested in growth at a reasonable price as GARP investors. Some of the things GARP investors focus on when evaluating mid-cap stocks include growth measures like sales and earnings growth rates along with value measures like price/earnings and price/cash flow.
Whatever measures you choose, the most important criteria should be the quality of the company. As the Oracle of Omaha says, it doesn’t make sense to get a great deal on a dud company. Deep-value investors might disagree, but true GARP followers are simply looking to avoid overpaying, not obtaining the deal of the century.
Investing in mid-caps is an excellent way to simultaneously diversify and enhance the performance of your investment portfolio. Some investors will find there’s too much work involved in evaluating individual stocks, and if that’s you, an excellent alternative is to invest in exchange-traded funds or mutual funds, letting the professionals handle the evaluation process. Whatever your preference is, mid-caps are definitely worth considering.
[ad_2]
Source link